The CSS table model is based on the HTML table model
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html
A table is divided into ROWS, and each row contains one or more cells. Cells are children of ROWS, they are NEVER children of columns.
"display: table-column" does NOT provide a mechanism for making columnar layouts (e.g. newspaper pages with multiple columns, where content can flow from one column to the next).
Rather, "table-column" ONLY sets attributes that apply to corresponding cells within the rows of a table. E.g. "The background color of the first cell in each row is green" can be described.
The table itself is always structured the same way it is in HTML.
In HTML (observe that "td"s are inside "tr"s, NOT inside "col"s):
<table ..>
<col .. />
<col .. />
<tr ..>
<td ..></td>
<td ..></td>
</tr>
<tr ..>
<td ..></td>
<td ..></td>
</tr>
</table>
Corresponding HTML using CSS table properties (Note that the "column" divs do not contain any contents -- the standard does not allow for contents directly in columns):
.mytable {
display: table;
}
.myrow {
display: table-row;
}
.mycell {
display: table-cell;
}
.column1 {
display: table-column;
background-color: green;
}
.column2 {
display: table-column;
}
<div class="mytable">
<div class="column1"></div>
<div class="column2"></div>
<div class="myrow">
<div class="mycell">contents of first cell in row 1</div>
<div class="mycell">contents of second cell in row 1</div>
</div>
<div class="myrow">
<div class="mycell">contents of first cell in row 2</div>
<div class="mycell">contents of second cell in row 2</div>
</div>
</div>
OPTIONAL: both "rows" and "columns" can be styled by assigning multiple classes to each row and cell as follows. This approach gives maximum flexibility in specifying various sets of cells, or individual cells, to be styled:
//Useful css declarations, depending on what you want to affect, include:
.mycell {
}
.row1 {
}
.row1 .mycell {
}
.row1 .cell1 {
}
.cell1 {
}
.mytable .row1 {
}
.mytable .row1 .mycell {
}
.mytable .row1 .cell1 {
}
.mytable .cell1 {
}
<div class="mytable">
<div class="column1"></div>
<div class="column2"></div>
<div class="myrow row1">
<div class="mycell cell1">contents of first cell in row 1</div>
<div class="mycell cell2">contents of second cell in row 1</div>
</div>
<div class="myrow row2">
<div class="mycell cell1">contents of first cell in row 2</div>
<div class="mycell cell2">contents of second cell in row 2</div>
</div>
</div>
In today's flexible designs, which use <div> for multiple purposes, it is wise to put some class on each div, to help refer to it. Here, what used to be <tr> in HTML became class myrow, and <td> became class mycell. This convention is what makes the above CSS selectors useful.
PERFORMANCE NOTE: putting class names on each cell, and using the above multi-class selectors, is better performance than using selectors ending with *, such as .row1 * or even .row1 > *. The reason is that selectors are matched last first, so when matching elements are being sought, .row1 * first does *, which matches all elements, and then checks all the ancestors of each element, to find if any ancestor has class row1. This might be slow in a complex document on a slow device. .row1 > * is better, because only the immediate parent is examined. But it is much better still to immediately eliminate most elements, via .row1 .cell1. (.row1 > .cell1 is an even tighter spec, but it is the first step of the search that makes the biggest difference, so it usually isn't worth the clutter, and the extra thought process as to whether it will always be a direct child, of adding the child selector >.)
The key point to take away re performance is that the last item in a selector should be as specific as possible, and should never be *.